Reading settings

Settings and reading history are stored only in this browser.

English中文0%

Select a passage or formula to leave a suggestion here. Saved suggestions remain private until reviewed.

Chapter 4. Measurable labels and finite moving blocks

This chapter follows Lemma 3.6 (pp. 13–14), Proposition 4.8 (pp. 22–23), and Section 5 (pp. 23–33) of R. Chapter 3 treated operators with the parameters fixed. We now establish the conditional i.i.d. structure of parameter pairs, recover individual coordinates from the grouped conclusions, construct measurable labels and finite blocks, and turn the original witness into a positive integral of a finite sum of absolute coefficients.

Fixed source, from page 13

Given the local parameter uu, the conditional probability space (Y,ηu)(Y,\eta _u) will be called a fibre. Its Hilbert space is Hu=L2(ηu)H_u=L^{2}(\eta _u). A parameter tuple is a finite list p=(p1,…,pk)p=(p_{1},\ldots ,p_k) ordered by position.

1. Three distinct steps

Chapter 3 proved that, for a fixed typical parameter square, the intersection of a cell's row-active and column-active spaces is spanned by common exact lines. Three further steps are needed.

First, the entire active space of a single tuple law must be spanned by exact lines. This requires more than the intersection statement: the conditionally independent, identically distributed parameter pairs in Lemma 3.6 and the kernel of an averaged projection exclude any missing vectors.

Second, the countable family of exact lines at each tuple must be listed measurably, with the resulting family depending only on the cell's local parameter uu. The source first uses compact-operator spectral enumeration over the full parameter tuple pp, then conditional independence to descend to uu. Choosing a basis separately in each fibre would not establish measurability.

Third, time must act on the resulting families. The conclusion only requires a permutation of whole finite blocks of labels. It does not assign individual labels a time rule independent of the parameter. Because the final observable sums absolute coefficients over a whole block, the possibly nonmeasurable abstract group identifications disappear from the function being integrated.

All spans are closed linear spans, and Hilbert inner products are linear in the second variable. The local state system YY is assumed neither mixing nor zero entropy, and the individual conditional measures ηu\eta _u need not be invariant under TYT_Y.

2. Lemma 3.6: conditional i.i.d. parameters at the diagonal

Write the square states as ya,jy_{a,j} and their local parameters as ua,ju_{a,j}. Let the row parameters be pa=(ua,j)jp_a=(u_{a,j})_j and the column parameters qj=(ua,j)aq_j=(u_{a,j})_a. Every parameter tuple has marginal law π\pi, with one-coordinate marginal ν\nu. Put

Ka(u,dq)=π(dq∣q[a]=u). K_a(u,\mathrm dq)=\pi(\mathrm dq\mid q[a]=u).

Write I={1,…,k}I=\{1,\ldots,k\}. The assertion is that, for every a∈Ia\in I and proper subset J⊊IJ\subsetneq I,

Law⁡((qj)j∈J∣pa)=⨂j∈JKa(pa[j],dqj).(18) \operatorname{Law}((q_j)_{j\in J}\mid p_a)=\bigotimes_{j\in J}K_a(p_a[j],\mathrm dq_j).\tag{18}

First take J=I∖{j0}J=I\setminus\{j_0\}. Let Z=Ya,IZ=Y_{a,I} be the whole row, O=(YI,j)j∈JO=(Y_{I,j})_{j\in J} the indicated whole columns, and S=(ya,j)j∈JS=(y_{a,j})_{j\in J} their shared entries. Use the extension that incorporates the first axis with no parent slots, projecting at position aa. Its admissibility is the base case of Lemma 3.4. The old O1,j0\mathcal O_{1,j_0} pulls back to σ(S)\sigma (S), while the new O1,j0′\mathcal O_{1,j_0}' is σ(O)\sigma (O). Applying saturation to a whole-row test FF gives

E[F(Z)∣O]=E[F(Z)∣S].(19) \mathbb E[F(Z)\mid O]=\mathbb E[F(Z)\mid S].\tag{19}

Since SS is a function of both ZZ and OO, for bounded F,GF,G,

E[F(Z)G(O)∣S]=E[E[F(Z)∣O]G(O)∣S]=E[F(Z)∣S]E[G(O)∣S]. \begin{aligned}\mathbb E[F(Z)G(O)\mid S]&=\mathbb E[\mathbb E[F(Z)\mid O]G(O)\mid S]\\&=\mathbb E[F(Z)\mid S]\mathbb E[G(O)\mid S].\end{aligned}

Thus ZZ and OO are independent given SS; in particular, Law⁡(O∣Z)=Law⁡(O∣S)\operatorname{Law}(O|Z)=\operatorname{Law}(O|S). Unconditionally, the whole columns indexed by JJ are independent, each with law m1m_{1}. Conditioning each column on its own shared entry gives

Law⁡(O∣Z)=⨂j∈Jm1(dYI,j∣ya,j). \operatorname{Law}(O\mid Z)=\bigotimes_{j\in J}m_1(\mathrm dY_{I,j}\mid y_{a,j}).

Now take the parameter images of these columns. In one column, the parameter qq and the state at position aa, denoted by yay_a, have joint law π(dq)ηq[a](dya)\pi(\mathrm dq)\eta_{q[a]}(\mathrm dy_a). Disintegrating π\pi over q[a]=uq[a]=u gives

ν(du)Ka(u,dq)ηu(dya). \nu(\mathrm du)K_a(u,\mathrm dq)\eta_u(\mathrm dy_a).

The measure ηu\eta _u is supported on u(ya)=uu(y_a)=u, so the conditional kernel of qq given yay_a is exactly Ka(u(ya),dq)K_a(u(y_a),\mathrm dq). The kernel of the column parameters given ZZ is therefore the right-hand side of (18). It depends only on pap_a, and pap_a is a function of ZZ. Conditioning further onto pap_a proves (18). Smaller JJ follow by taking marginals.

At a diagonal cell, take a=ia=i and j=ij=i. Given pip_i, the kernel of qiq_i is Ki(pi[i],dqi)K_i(p_i[i],\mathrm dq_i). The marginal of pip_i is π\pi, so, given the shared value u=ui,iu=u_{i,i}, the kernel of pip_i is also Ki(u,⋅)K_i(u,\cdot ). Hence

Law⁡(pi,qi∣u)=Ki(u,dpi)⊗Ki(u,dqi). \operatorname{Law}(p_i,q_i\mid u)=K_i(u,\mathrm dp_i)\otimes K_i(u,\mathrm dq_i).

This establishes the conditional i.i.d. pair of parameter tuples needed below. It does not give a product law for the entire parameter square.

3. Proposition 4.8: recovering exact relations at all individual coordinates

Fix a cell (a,j)(a,j). Make row aa and column jj singleton groups, and split the remaining rows and columns into two nonempty groups each. The cell's active spaces VV and WW are independent of this grouping, since the other two groups still contain all remaining coordinates in its row or column. Chapter 3 gives commuting projections onto VV and WW, with D=V∩WD=V\cap W spanned by lines exact for both three-cell groupings.

The same lines must work for every partition. First keep the row grouping fixed and vary the column grouping. The resulting families of common exact lines are subsets of the orthogonal exact-line family of one fixed column law, and they all span the same DD. Two subsets of an orthogonal family with the same closed span must coincide: a line appearing in only one subset would be orthogonal to the entire span of the other. Thus the lines work for every column partition. Fixing the original column grouping and varying the row grouping gives the corresponding assertion for every row partition.

For k=3k=3, no grouped coordinates remain to be split. Suppose k>3k>3 and choose a modulus-one representative χj\chi _j of one line at the cell. For every nontrivial bipartition of I∖{j}I\setminus\{j\}, written S∪Sc=I∖{j}S\cup S^c=I\setminus\{j\} with complement taken within I∖{j}I\setminus\{j\}, there are modulus-one functions aSa_S and bSb_S such that

χj(Yj)aS(YS)bS(YSc)=cS,cS∈T. \chi_j(Y_j)a_S(Y_S)b_S(Y_{S^c})=c_S,\qquad c_S\in\mathbb T.

After absorbing constant phases, all products aSbSa_Sb_S equal the same function of the other coordinates, Φ=χj(Yj)‾\Phi =\overline{\chi _j(Y_j)}. Those k−1k-1 coordinates have a product marginal, so these function identities hold in their product probability space.

For every singleton partition {i}\{i\}, the function Φ\Phi belongs to the tensor product of the one-dimensional line span⁡(ai)\operatorname{span}(a_i) with the L2L^{2} space of the other coordinates. The projections onto the individual span⁡(ai)\operatorname{span}(a_i) act on different tensor factors, so they commute, and they all fix Φ\Phi. Their product has a one-dimensional tensor range. Thus Φ\Phi is the pure product of the aia_i up to a constant phase, and χj\chi _j completes to an exact tuple on all kk individual coordinates. The column argument is identical. Conversely, lines exact for the full row and column belong to DD.

The second assertion, intertwining, also follows directly from Chapter 3. Make the given row aa a singleton group, make the two target columns s,ts,t singleton groups, and put the other columns in the third group. Split the remaining rows into two groups. The row-edge intertwining in Lemma 4.4 is then exactly

Pa,sWLs←ta(v)=Ls←ta(v)Pa,tW. P^W_{a,s}L^a_{s\leftarrow t}(v)=L^a_{s\leftarrow t}(v)P^W_{a,t}.

Here vv records the other k−2k-2 states in the row. The array axes have not been interchanged.

If an exact tuple on the full row satisfies ∏j∈Iχj(Yj)=c\prod_{j\in I}\chi_j(Y_j)=c, then

Ls←ta(v)χt=c[∏j≠s,tχj(vj)‾]χs‾.(36) L^a_{s\leftarrow t}(v)\chi_t=c\left[\prod_{j\ne s,t}\overline{\chi_j(v_j)}\right]\overline{\chi_s}.\tag{36}

The scalar has modulus one. Intertwining and conjugation invariance of PWP^W show that one partner line belongs to its column-active space if and only if the other partner lines belong to their respective column-active spaces. Reverse edges give the converse implication.

There are only finitely many groupings and positions. Intermediate groups or bases may be chosen nonmeasurably with the parameters fixed. The proposition concerns only the active spaces and exact lines of the original conditional kernels; measurable enumeration has yet to be established.

4. Lemma 5.1: from intersections to the full active space

Let Hu=L2(ηu)H_u=L^{2}(\eta _u). A countable family of bounded simple tests on the state space, followed by Gram–Schmidt, realizes this Hilbert field in a common measurable ℓ2\ell ^{2} coordinate system, padding zero directions with zeros. The construction depends only on uu. Thus two tuples sharing the same uu use the same HuH_u.

Let Πi(p)\Pi_i(p) be the orthogonal projection onto the active space of λp\lambda _p at position ii, and let Ci(p)C_i(p) be the closed span of its exact lines. Countable product tests for conditional expectation give measurable generators of the active space. Their finite-dimensional projections increase to Πi(p)\Pi_i(p), making Πi\Pi_i a measurable operator field. Measurability of CiC_i is not yet assumed.

By Section 2, at the cell (i,i)(i,i), the tuples p,qp,q are conditionally i.i.d. given uu, with common kernel πiu=π(dp∣pi=u)\pi_i^u=\pi(\mathrm dp\mid p_i=u). Section 3 gives, for almost every such parameter pair,

Πi(p)Πi(q)=Πi(q)Πi(p),Ran⁡Πi(p)∩Ran⁡Πi(q)⊆Ci(p).(38) \begin{gathered}\Pi_i(p)\Pi_i(q)=\Pi_i(q)\Pi_i(p),\\\operatorname{Ran}\Pi_i(p)\cap\operatorname{Ran}\Pi_i(q)\subseteq C_i(p).\end{gathered}\tag{38}

The almost-everywhere assertion does not require measurability of CiC_i. Start with a measurable conull set of parameter squares specified by countably many kernel identities, and disintegrate over their (p,q)(p,q) images. On a measurable conull set of parameter pairs, the conditional law is concentrated on admissible squares with the specified (p,q)(p,q). Every such pair therefore has an admissible completion. Conclusion (38) depends only on the two conditional laws specified by p,qp,q, and not on the chosen completion. No measurable completion is selected, and no integral involving CiC_i is taken.

For typical uu, define the positive contraction

Bi,u=∫Πi(q) πiu(dq),Qi,u=proj⁡Ker⁡Bi,u.(39) B_{i,u}=\int\Pi_i(q)\,\pi_i^u(\mathrm dq),\qquad Q_{i,u}=\operatorname{proj}_{\operatorname{Ker}B_{i,u}}.\tag{39}

Here Qi,uQ_{i,u} is the orthogonal projection onto the kernel taken inside HuH_u.

The integral is defined through matrix coefficients. The operator QQ is, on HuH_u, the strong limit of (id⁡Hu−Bi,u)n(\operatorname{id}_{H_u}-B_{i,u})^n, and is therefore measurable. In an ambient ℓ2\ell ^{2} realization, first project the standard vectors eje_j onto HuH_u and extend the operators by zero outside HuH_u. The ambient orthogonal complement must not be mistaken for part of the fibrewise kernel.

For these eje_j,

∫∥Πi(p)Qi,uej∥2 πiu(dp)=⟨Qi,uej,Bi,uQi,uej⟩=0. \int\|\Pi_i(p)Q_{i,u}e_j\|^2\,\pi_i^u(\mathrm dp)=\langle Q_{i,u}e_j,B_{i,u}Q_{i,u}e_j\rangle=0.

Taking a countable intersection and then adjoints gives, for almost every pp,

Ran⁡Πi(p)⊆(Ker⁡Bi,u)⊥.(40) \operatorname{Ran}\Pi_i(p)\subseteq(\operatorname{Ker}B_{i,u})^\perp.\tag{40}

Among the parameters with a conull qq-section for (38), fix pp also satisfying (40). If v∈Ran⁡Πi(p)v\in \operatorname{Ran} \Pi_i(p) and v⊥Ci(p)v\perp C_i(p), commutation puts Πi(q)v\Pi_i(q)v in the intersection in (38), so

∥Πi(q)v∥2=⟨v,Πi(q)v⟩=0. \|\Pi_i(q)v\|^2=\langle v,\Pi_i(q)v\rangle=0.

Integration gives ⟨v,Bi,uv⟩=0\langle v,B_{i,u}v\rangle =0, hence v∈Ker⁡Bi,uv\in \operatorname{Ker} B_{i,u}. By (40), v=0v=0. Every exact line already lies in the active space, so

Ran⁡Πi(p)=Ci(p).(37) \operatorname{Ran}\Pi_i(p)=C_i(p).\tag{37}

For this fixed pp, (38) is a statement about the entire subspace on a conull qq-section. The argument therefore applies to every vv at once. No measurable dependence on pp is required for a counterexample vector vv.

5. First part of Proposition 5.2: measurable enumeration over tuples

5.1 Measurable compact operators before measurable bases

Fix a position ii and another position j≠ij\ne i. Let

Δi(p):Hpi⟶⨂t≠iHpt \Delta_i(p):H_{p_i}\longrightarrow\bigotimes_{t\ne i}H_{p_t}

be conditional expectation from cell ii onto all the other cells. The other k−1k-1 coordinates have a product marginal, so the target is exactly their L2L^{2} space. The operator Δ\Delta is measurable and contractive. It is the adjoint of reverse conditional expectation and hence vanishes on the orthogonal complement of the active space.

If χℓ\chi _\ell is a unit representative of an exact line, then Δχℓ\Delta\chi _\ell is a unit pure tensor of the conjugate partner representatives at the other cells, up to a constant phase. In the unit ball of every HuH_u, choose countably many dense tests gn(u)g_n(u). Put θgh=g⟨g,h⟩\theta _g h=g\langle g,h\rangle and define

An(p)=Δi(p)∗[θgn(pj)⊗id⁡t≠i,j]Δi(p).(41) A_n(p)=\Delta_i(p)^*\bigl[\theta_{g_n(p_j)}\otimes\operatorname{id}_{t\ne i,j}\bigr]\Delta_i(p).\tag{41}

The matrix coefficients of these operators are already measurable, without enumerating the lines. Now fix pp and analyze AnA_n using the orthogonal basis of exact lines established in Section 4. For distinct labels, the corresponding partner representatives in the two pure tensors are orthogonal at every other position. Since k≥3k\ge 3, at least one factor outside i,ji,j has no inserted θ\theta and makes the off-diagonal coefficient vanish. Thus AnA_n is diagonal on these lines. Let wj,ℓw_{j,\ell} denote the unit tensor factor of Δi(p)χℓ\Delta_i(p)\chi_\ell at position jj. It is the conjugate of the partner representative at that position in the exact tuple, up to a constant phase. The eigenvalues are

an(ℓ)=∣⟨gn(pj),wj,ℓ⟩∣2,tr⁡An(p)=∑ℓan(ℓ)≤1.(42) a_n(\ell)=|\langle g_n(p_j),w_{j,\ell}\rangle|^2,\qquad\operatorname{tr}A_n(p)=\sum_\ell a_n(\ell)\le1.\tag{42}

The trace bound is Bessel's inequality. The dense tests detect every line and distinguish the coefficient sequences of any two distinct lines.

5.2 Positive random weights give simple spectrum

Choose independent weights with continuous distributions satisfying 0<wn<2−n0<w_n<2^{-n}, and put A(p,w)=∑n≥1wnAn(p)A(p,w)=\sum_{n\ge1}w_n A_n(p). The series converges in operator norm, is jointly measurable and positive, and has finite trace, so it is compact. It may be set to zero on any remaining null parameter set where these properties fail. Finiteness of the trace is a measurable condition, checked by a countable sum of diagonal coefficients.

Repetition of a positive eigenvalue must be detected measurably. For a positive compact operator AA, its norm α\alpha can be computed from countably many dense vectors. If α>0\alpha >0, the strong limit (A/α)m(A/\alpha )^m is the top-eigenvalue projection QQ. Both the matrix coefficients and rank of QQ are measurable. Subtract αQ\alpha Q and repeat to enumerate all distinct positive eigenvalues and their finite-dimensional eigenspaces. Thus the event that some positive spectral projection has rank at least two is measurable, without any prior measurable enumeration of exact lines.

For each fixed pp, distinct exact lines have different sequences (an(ℓ))n(a_n(\ell ))_n. Choose a coordinate nn at which they differ. Conditional on the other weights, equality of the weighted eigenvalues allows at most one value of wnw_n, an event of probability zero. There are only countably many orthogonal lines at each pp, so the probability of repeated positive spectrum is zero. Fubini applied to this measurable event gives one deterministic sequence of weights for which all positive eigenvalues are simple for π\pi-almost every pp.

Every exact line in the active space has some an>0a_n>0. Since all wnw_n are positive, its weighted eigenvalue is strictly positive. The kernel is exactly the orthogonal complement of the active space. Positive eigenvalues tending to zero do not create additional kernel vectors. The rank-one positive spectral projections therefore enumerate precisely all exact lines.

5.3 Representatives, matching, and measurability

For each rank-one projection, choose the first vector in the countable coordinate list with nonzero projection and normalize its image. This gives a measurable unit representative. Since it belongs to an exact line, it is a modulus-one function almost everywhere.

At this stage, a measurable section is still parametrized by the full tuple pp. At a fixed position ii, it takes values in HpiH_{p_i}. The approximation below gives function representatives jointly measurable in (p,y)(p,y). The conclusion that the family of exact lines depends only on the local parameter uu is established in Section 6 of this chapter. Producing jointly measurable function representatives from a measurable vector section takes a further approximation. In each fibre, use a countable family of rational simple sections and choose the first approximation with error at most 2−m2^{-m}; the selection criterion is measurable. Successive differences are summable in integrated L2L^{2}, hence also in integrated L1L^{1}. They yield a jointly measurable almost-everywhere limit representing the original section. Mere existence of representatives separately in every fibre would not suffice.

A listed family of modulus-one representatives χi\chi _i is an exact tuple if and only if

∣∫∏i∈Iχi dλp∣=1.(43) \left|\int\prod_{i\in I}\chi_i\,\mathrm d\lambda_p\right|=1.\tag{43}

This is a measurable scalar condition. Uniqueness of partners identifies the unique matching tuple of lines in the countable lists. Both enumeration and exact matching over tuples are therefore measurable.

6. Descending from tuple lists to the local parameter uu

The preceding spectral enumeration still depends on the whole tuple pp. A further argument is needed to remove that dependence.

6.1 Membership in column-active spaces is one common 0/10/1 variable

Fix a typical square and exact lines matched along row aa, with representatives vjv_j. Let Qj=Πa(qj)Q_j=\Pi_a(q_j) be the projection onto the corresponding column-active space. It commutes with the row-active projection, and their intersection is spanned by common exact lines. Orthogonality of the exact lines gives

Qjvj=εjvj,εj∈{0,1}.(44) Q_jv_j=\varepsilon_jv_j,\qquad\varepsilon_j\in\{0,1\}.\tag{44}

The equality εj=1\varepsilon _j=1 means precisely that this row label is also an exact line in its column. Equation (36), projection intertwining, and conjugation invariance imply εj=εt\varepsilon _j=\varepsilon _t for every j,tj,t.

Choose the row labels from the measurable lists of the previous section. Given the row parameter pap_a, the variable εj\varepsilon _j depends only on qjq_j and the fixed representatives. By Lemma 3.6, distinct qjq_j are pairwise conditionally independent, so the εj\varepsilon _j are as well. They are also almost everywhere equal. Their common conditional mean r(pa)r(p_a) therefore satisfies r=r2r=r^{2} and takes only the values zero and one.

At the diagonal position j=aj=a, the averaged projection from Section 4 gives

r(pa)=∫∥Πa(q)va∥2 π(dq∣q[a]=pa[a])=⟨va,Ba,pa[a]va⟩>0. \begin{aligned}r(p_a)&=\int\|\Pi_a(q)v_a\|^2\,\pi(\mathrm dq\mid q[a]=p_a[a])\\&=\langle v_a,B_{a,p_a[a]}v_a\rangle>0.\end{aligned}

Strict positivity follows from (40) and va≠0v_a\ne 0: vanishing of the positive operator's quadratic form puts the vector in its kernel, whereas the active space is orthogonal to that kernel. Thus r=1r=1. Intersecting over countably many row labels and finitely many cells shows that every row exact line is also an exact line in its cell's column.

6.2 Conditional i.i.d. tuples make the whole family depend only on uu

At (i,i)(i,i), the exact-line families at position ii of the two conditionally i.i.d. tuples satisfy an almost-everywhere inclusion. Interchanging the two i.i.d. copies gives the reverse inclusion, hence equality.

To make this a measurable descent, avoid choosing a tuple as a function of uu. Use the local dense tests gn(u)g_n(u) to encode an orthogonal family of unit lines S\mathcal S by

Kn(S)=∑v∈S∣⟨gn(u),v⟩∣2θv.(45) K_n(\mathcal S)=\sum_{v\in\mathcal S}|\langle g_n(u),v\rangle|^2\theta_v.\tag{45}

This expression is independent of phases and enumeration, and has trace at most one. Its matrix coefficients are measurable by the tuple enumeration. Given uu, the two independent, identically distributed encodings agree. Every bounded matrix coefficient therefore has zero conditional variance and equals its conditional expectation given uu. The encodings descend to measurable operator fields depending only on uu.

The encoding determines S\mathcal S. In each fixed fibre, all KnK_n are diagonal on S\mathcal S, and the dense tests detect and distinguish its lines. The positive-weight simple-spectrum construction recovers the same family from these operators. The measurable spectral recursion therefore gives a local list Li(u)\mathcal L_i(u) agreeing with the original list for almost every pp with pi=up_i=u. No measurable representative tuple has been chosen.

At an off-diagonal cell (a,j)(a,j), the inclusion from Section 6.1 now reads Lj(ua,j)⊆La(ua,j)\mathcal L_j(u_{a,j})\subseteq \mathcal L_a(u_{a,j}). The single parameter has marginal ν\nu. Running over the finitely many ordered pairs a,ja,j shows that all Li(u)\mathcal L_i(u) coincide almost everywhere, giving one common local list L(u)\mathcal L(u). No exchangeability of the parameter tuple law across positions is assumed.

6.3 Group operations, time, and square matching

Multiply lines modulo constant phase. Lemma 4.2 makes L(u)\mathcal L(u) a countable abelian group, whose zero is the constant line. Distinct labels are orthogonal, and nonzero labels have mean zero. Choose measurable representatives χu,ℓ\chi _{u,\ell } satisfying χu,0=1\chi _{u,0}=1 and

χu,ℓχu,ℓ′∈Tχu,ℓ+ℓ′. \chi_{u,\ell}\chi_{u,\ell'}\in\mathbb T\chi_{u,\ell+\ell'}.

Two unit vectors span the same line exactly when their inner product has absolute value one. Searching the lists with this measurable test for products, inverses, and partners gives measurable group operations and group isomorphisms Φst(p):L(ps)→L(pt)\Phi_{st}(p):\mathcal L(p_s)\to\mathcal L(p_t).

Covariance of the time kernels, ηTUu=(TY)∗ηu\eta _{T_Uu}=(T_Y)_*\eta _u and λTUIp=(TYI)∗λp\lambda _{T_U^I p}=(T_Y^I)_*\lambda _p, makes [χ]↦[χ∘TY−1][\chi ]\mapsto [\chi \circ T_Y^{-1}] define τu:L(u)→L(TUu)\tau_u:\mathcal L(u)\to\mathcal L(T_Uu), preserving exact matching. The measurable lists and equality test make τ\tau and its inverse measurable. Intersecting over integer time shifts gives invariant conull sets separately for local parameters, tuples, and squares. It does not imply validity for every tuple assembled from good local parameters.

A label at one cell uniquely completes its row, and then uniquely completes every column. The representative product in every column is constant, as is the product in the initial row. Thus the product of the remaining k−1k-1 row products is constant. These remaining whole rows form a conditionally independent proper subfamily, and each row product has modulus one. The product of the absolute values of their means is therefore one, forcing each mean to have absolute value one and each row product to be constant. Every row is consequently matched. Uniqueness follows from uniqueness in the initial row and then each column. Countability of the label lists makes the assertion simultaneous for every initial label on a conull set of square parameters.

7. Lemma 5.3: the role of counting measure

Set Z={(u,ℓ):ℓ∈L(u)}Z=\{(u,\ell):\ell\in\mathcal L(u)\} and define ξ(du,dℓ)=ν(du) #L(u)(dℓ)\xi(\mathrm du,\mathrm d\ell)=\nu(\mathrm du)\,\#_{\mathcal L(u)}(\mathrm d\ell), where #L(u)\#_{\mathcal L(u)} denotes counting measure on the label group. The set consisting of the first NN labels in each fibre has mass at most NN, so ξ\xi is σ\sigma-finite. The map τ(u,ℓ)=(TUu,τuℓ)\tau (u,\ell )=(T_Uu,\tau _u\ell ) preserves ξ\xi.

Over a parameter tuple pp, one position's label determines a unique matching tuple. Counting these matching tuples over π(dp)\pi(\mathrm dp) gives, on ZIZ^I, the measure π~\widetilde\pi. Counting matching label squares similarly gives ϑ~\widetilde\vartheta. Uniqueness ensures that counting from any coordinate produces the same measure. Every coordinate marginal is therefore ξ\xi, and every row or column marginal is π~\widetilde\pi. Both lifted spaces are exhausted by the inverse images of the first NN labels in one coordinate, so both measures are σ\sigma-finite.

For s≠ts\ne t, the transition kernel is

Kst((u,ℓ),A)=∫1A(pt,Φst(p)ℓ) π(dp∣ps=u).(46) K_{st}((u,\ell),A)=\int\mathbf1_A(p_t,\Phi_{st}(p)\ell)\,\pi(\mathrm dp\mid p_s=u).\tag{46}

This is a probability kernel even when the total measure is infinite. Once the source label is fixed, each compatible parameter tuple has exactly one completion, with no extra counting weight. Likewise, given a labelled row, the conditional parameter-square law remains the original law given that row's parameters: every compatible square has exactly one label completion.

By Lemma 3.6, given a labelled row, every proper subfamily of labelled columns is independent. The parameter columns are conditionally independent, and each column's labels are determined by its own parameters and the label at its shared cell.

Put (MstF)(zs)=∫F(zt)Kst(zs,dzt)(M_{st}F)(z_s)=\int F(z_t)K_{st}(z_s,\mathrm dz_t). Both coordinate marginals are ξ\xi, so Jensen's inequality gives a contraction on L2(ξ)L^{2}(\xi ). Interchanging the coordinates gives Mst∗=MtsM_{st}^*=M_{ts}. Time equivariance makes MstM_{st} commute with VF=F∘τV F=F\circ \tau.

For any a≠ba\ne b and s≠ts\ne t, take, in row bb of the labelled square, two L2L^{2} tests. Conditional on row aa, the transitions in columns s,ts,t are both MabM_{ab} and are independent. Hence

⟨f,Mstg⟩=∫f(zb,s)‾g(zb,t) dϑ~=∫(Mabf)(za,s)‾(Mabg)(za,t) dϑ~=⟨Mabf,MstMabg⟩. \begin{aligned}\langle f,M_{st}g\rangle&=\int\overline{f(z_{b,s})}g(z_{b,t})\,\mathrm d\widetilde\vartheta\\&=\int\overline{(M_{ab}f)(z_{a,s})}(M_{ab}g)(z_{a,t})\,\mathrm d\widetilde\vartheta\\&=\langle M_{ab}f,M_{st}M_{ab}g\rangle.\end{aligned}

Therefore

Mst=Mab∗MstMab.(47) M_{st}=M_{ab}^*M_{st}M_{ab}.\tag{47}

Cauchy–Schwarz on the two coordinates with marginal ξ\xi controls all integrals. Alternatively, start with bounded tests supported on sets of finite measure and approximate in L2L^{2}. The infinite counting measure is never normalized to a probability measure.

8. Lemma 5.4: from deterministic transport to finite blocks

8.1 The unitary part of a contraction

Fix s≠ts\ne t and write M=MstM=M_{st}. In (47), take (a,b)=(s,t)(a,b)=(s,t) and (t,s)(t,s) to obtain

M=M∗MM=MMM∗.(50) M=M^*MM=MMM^*.\tag{50}

Put H1=Ran⁡M‾H_1=\overline{\operatorname{Ran}M} and H2=Ran⁡M∗‾H_2=\overline{\operatorname{Ran}M^*}. The first identity places H1H_{1} in the fixed space of M∗MM^*M, which is contained in H2H_{2}. The adjoint of the second places H2H_{2} in the fixed space of MM∗MM^*, which is contained in H1H_{1}. Hence H1=H2=HH_{1}=H_{2}=H.

On HH, we have M∗M=MM∗=id⁡HM^*M=MM^*=\operatorname{id}_H; on H⊥=Ker⁡MH^\perp =\operatorname{Ker} M, we have M=0M=0. Thus M∣HM|_H is unitary with inverse M∗M^*. In particular, for F∈HF\in H, the equal-norm identity for conditional expectation gives

∫∣F(zt)−(MF)(zs)∣2 dπ~st=∥F∥22−∥MF∥22=0. \int|F(z_t)-(MF)(z_s)|^2\,\mathrm d\widetilde\pi_{st}=\|F\|_2^2-\|MF\|_2^2=0.

Equivalently,

F(zt)=(MF)(zs)π~st-a.e.(51) F(z_t)=(MF)(z_s)\qquad\widetilde\pi_{st}\text{-a.e.}\tag{51}

The original transition kernel need not be deterministic everywhere. Deterministic transport has been obtained for the observation functions in HH.

8.2 A strictly positive L2L^{2} test

Using the local enumeration, set h(u,ℓn(u))=2−nh(u,\ell _n(u))=2^{-n}. Then h>0h>0 and ∥h∥22≤∑n≥14−n\|h\|_2^2\le\sum_{n\ge1}4^{-n}. The probability kernel KstK_{st} has target marginal ξ\xi, so it assigns zero probability to ξ\xi-null sets at almost every source point. Hence v=Mh>0v=Mh>0 almost everywhere, and v∈H∩L2v\in H\cap L^{2}.

The unitary VV commutes with MM and M∗M^* and preserves HH. Define the measurable countable vector

ψ(z)=((MnVrv)(z))(n,r)∈Z2.(52) \psi(z)=\bigl((M^nV^rv)(z)\bigr)_{(n,r)\in\mathbb Z^2}.\tag{52}

Negative powers of MM are taken only on HH. All coordinates have finite versions on a common conull set, with strictly positive (0,0)(0,0) coordinate. Define shifts D0D_{0} and S0S_{0} on these sequence coordinates by increasing nn and rr, respectively, by one. Equation (51) and commutation with time give

ψ(zt)=D0ψ(zs),ψ(τz)=S0ψ(z).(53) \psi(z_t)=D_0\psi(z_s),\qquad\psi(\tau z)=S_0\psi(z).\tag{53}

The maps D0D_{0} and S0S_{0} are commuting invertible coordinate permutations.

8.3 Countability from an unchanged target-parameter law

Given a source point z=(u,ℓ)z=(u,\ell ), the target parameter of KstK_{st} still has law ν\nu. This uses the law π\pi and independence of its coordinates ps,ptp_s,p_t and the fact that fixing a label does not alter the parameter kernel. The independence holds because, for k≥3k\ge 3, two positions form a proper subfamily; the unchanged kernel follows from the counting construction with unique completions.

Define the measurable relation R(z,u′)R(z,u') by existence, in the fibre over u′u', of a label ℓn(u′)\ell _n(u') satisfying ψ(u′,ℓn(u′))=D0ψ(z)\psi (u',\ell _n(u'))=D_{0}\psi (z). Existence is a countable union, and equality of sequences is a countable conjunction of coordinate equalities. By (53), for ξ\xi-almost every zz, the relation R(z,u′)R(z,u') holds for a set of u′u' of full ν\nu-measure.

Apply Tonelli to the σ\sigma-finite measure ξ⊗ν\xi\otimes\nu. Choose one fixed u′u' such that R(z,u′)R(z,u') holds for ξ\xi-almost every zz. This target fibre has only countably many values of ψ\psi. Since D0D_{0} is invertible, ψ\psi has countable essential range. Only one fixed target fibre is selected; no measurable selection of a target label for each zz is required.

Let B\mathcal B be the set of values of positive mass in this countable range. Define

Eb={z:ψ(z)=b},Bb(u)={ℓ:(u,ℓ)∈Eb}. E_b=\{z:\psi(z)=b\},\qquad B_b(u)=\{\ell:(u,\ell)\in E_b\}.

For bb, its (0,0)(0,0) coordinate b00b_{00} is strictly positive, and

0<ξ(Eb)≤∥v∥22∣b00∣2<∞.(54) 0<\xi(E_b)\le\frac{\|v\|_2^2}{|b_{00}|^2}<\infty.\tag{54}

Thus Bb(u)B_b(u) is finite for almost every uu. A countable intersection puts every label in each good fibre into one of these finite blocks. This alone does not yet make each block nonempty or give it the same cardinality in every fibre.

Equality of the two marginals and invariance of ξ\xi under time make D0D_{0} and S0S_{0} permutations of B\mathcal B, preserving ξ(Eb)\xi (E_b) along their orbits. Equation (53) and countability of the labels show that, for π\pi-almost every pp, the map Φst(p)\Phi_{st}(p) carries each Bb(ps)B_b(p_s) bijectively onto BD0b(pt)B_{D_{0}b}(p_t). The reverse inclusion uses bijectivity of Φst\Phi_{st} and invertibility of D0D_{0}; a single inclusion would not establish equality.

8.4 Cancelling the common block shift gives fixed finite cardinalities

Disintegrate the measurable conull set of admissible parameter tuples over (ps,pt)(p_s,p_t). Its marginal is ν⊗ν\nu\otimes\nu, so almost every pair (u,w)(u,w) has a tuple completion satisfying the required conditions. Fubini gives a common source u∗u_* with such completions for almost every target uu.

For each target uu, choose one resulting group isomorphism Iu:L(u∗)→L(u)I_u:\mathcal L(u_*)\to\mathcal L(u) pointwise. Every IuI_u sends block bb to block D0bD_{0}b. No measurability of IuI_u in uu is required.

Fix one good target u0u_{0}, take the abstract group L=L(u0)\mathcal L=\mathcal L(u_0), and put Ju=IuIu0−1J_u=I_u I_{u_{0}}^{-1}. The inverse of Iu0I_{u_{0}} pulls target block bb back to source block D0−1bD_{0}^{-1}b, which IuI_u sends to target block bb. Thus JuJ_u preserves every block index. Each cardinality ∣Bb(u)∣|B_b(u)| is consequently almost everywhere the same integer mbm_b. By (54), that integer is finite and strictly positive.

Write the abstract blocks as Bb=Bb(u0)B_b=B_b(u_{0}). Choose one uu in the common invariant conull set for local time equivariance, and define

A=JTUu−1τuJu. A=J_{T_Uu}^{-1}\tau_uJ_u.

This is an automorphism of L\mathcal L sending each BbB_b to BS0bB_{S_{0}b}. Taking G=A−1G=A^{-1} gives

GrBb=BS0−rb,r∈Z.(49) G^rB_b=B_{S_0^{-r}b},\qquad r\in\mathbb Z.\tag{49}

Once fixed, GG implements the permutation of whole blocks. The proof does not assert τuJu=JTUuG−1\tau _uJ_u=J_{T_Uu}G^{-1} for every uu, or identify the actual time orbit of each individual fibre label with an abstract GG orbit. The block-level conclusion is exactly what the next step needs.

9. Proposition 5.5: locating the witness in a finite block

Suppose the original XX is the zero-entropy finite-alphabet mixing process from Proposition 2.1 and the first level retains the nonzero witness correlation. Fix a position ii. Given a parameter tuple pp, condition the product of the other witness functions onto cell ii. The result lies in the active space of Πi(p)\Pi_i(p). If fi∘κf_i\circ \kappa were orthogonal to that space for almost every pp, the original witness integral would vanish. The product of the other functions may be conjugated to respect the second-variable-linear inner product; the active space is invariant under conjugation.

Lemma 5.1 and the local label lists therefore give a witness f=fif=f_i with a nonzero coefficient at some local label on a set of parameters of positive ν\nu-measure. Since κ∗ηu=μX\kappa _*\eta _u=\mu _X,

∫f(κ(y)) dηu(y)=∫f dμX=0. \int f(\kappa(y))\,\mathrm d\eta_u(y)=\int f\,\mathrm d\mu_X=0.

The coefficient of the identity label vanishes, so nonzero labels carry the correlation.

We continue to write κ(y)\kappa(y) for what the source abbreviates here as x(y)x(y). For each block bb, define the intrinsic measurable function

cb(u)=∑ℓ∈Bb(u)∣∫f(κ(y))χu,ℓ(y)‾ dηu(y)∣. c_b(u)=\sum_{\ell\in B_b(u)}\left|\int f(\kappa(y))\overline{\chi_{u,\ell}(y)}\,\mathrm d\eta_u(y)\right|.

There are countably many blocks, and they cover all labels. If every cbc_b had zero integral, each would vanish almost everywhere; a countable intersection would make all coefficients vanish, contradicting the preceding conclusion. Thus some fixed bb satisfies c=∫cb dν>0c=\int c_b\,\mathrm d\nu>0. The block has fixed finite size, and cb≤mb∥f∥∞c_b\le m_b\|f\|_{\infty }, so cc is finite. Set B=Bb⊆LB=B_b\subseteq\mathcal L.

For each good uu, use the existing block-preserving identification JuJ_u and define χℓu=χu,Juℓ\chi _\ell ^u=\chi _{u,J_u\ell }. Although measurability of JuJ_u has not been established, within each fixed fibre these representatives satisfy

χ0u=1,∣χℓu∣=1,χℓuχℓ′u∈Tχℓ+ℓ′u,∫χℓu dηu=0(ℓ≠0),⟨χℓu,χℓ′u⟩=1{ℓ=ℓ′}.(55) \begin{gathered}\chi_0^u=1,\quad|\chi_\ell^u|=1,\quad\chi_\ell^u\chi_{\ell'}^u\in\mathbb T\chi_{\ell+\ell'}^u,\\\int\chi_\ell^u\,\mathrm d\eta_u=0\quad(\ell\ne0),\qquad\langle\chi_\ell^u,\chi_{\ell'}^u\rangle=\mathbf1_{\{\ell=\ell'\}}.\end{gathered}\tag{55}

For r≥0r\ge 0, equation (56) of the source defines

sr(u)=∑ℓ∈B∣∫f(TXrκ(y))χGrℓu(y)‾ dηu(y)∣.(56) s_r(u)=\sum_{\ell\in B}\left|\int f(T_X^r\kappa(y))\overline{\chi_{G^r\ell}^u(y)}\,\mathrm d\eta_u(y)\right|.\tag{56}

This expression involves the possibly nonmeasurable JuJ_u and does not by itself establish measurability of srs_r. By (49) and the block-preserving property of JuJ_u, it equals

∑ℓ′∈BS0−rb(u)∣∫f(TXrκ(y))χu,ℓ′(y)‾ dηu(y)∣.(58) \sum_{\ell'\in B_{S_0^{-r}b}(u)}\left|\int f(T_X^r\kappa(y))\overline{\chi_{u,\ell'}(y)}\,\mathrm d\eta_u(y)\right|.\tag{58}

The right-hand side sums over a measurable finite block in the measurable local list, so it is measurable. Changing a representative by a constant phase, or permuting labels within the block, leaves the absolute coefficients and their sum unchanged. This removes the need for measurable JuJ_u.

Finally, use covariance of the conditional kernels:

(TYr)∗ηu=ηTUru. (T_Y^r)_*\eta_u=\eta_{T_U^ru}.

Put y′=TYryy'=T_Y^{r}y. Since κ\kappa intertwines time, f(TXrκ(y))=f(κ(y′))f(T_X^{r}\kappa (y))=f(\kappa (y')). The representative χu,ℓ′∘TY−r\chi _{u,\ell '}\circ T_Y^{-r} differs from the representative of the time-transported label only by a constant phase. Time maps BS0−rb(u)B_{S_{0}^{-r}b}(u) bijectively onto Bb(TUru)B_b(T_U^{r}u), giving

sr(u)=cb(TUru).(59) s_r(u)=c_b(T_U^ru).\tag{59}

The measure ν\nu is time invariant. Thus, for every r≥0r\ge 0,

0≤sr(u)≤∣B∣∥f∥∞,∫sr(u) dν(u)=c>0.(57) 0\le s_r(u)\le|B|\|f\|_\infty,\qquad\int s_r(u)\,\mathrm d\nu(u)=c>0.\tag{57}

The integer times rr are countable, so these identities hold on one invariant local conull set. Labels and label pairs in every fibre are also countable. Modulus one, orthogonality, and all required product relations can therefore hold simultaneously on a conull set of local parameters, and then on a common ηu\eta _u-conull set in each typical fibre. No assertion is made for every parameter value or every parameter tuple.

The original nonzero correlation has now become a finite sum of absolute coefficients whose integral is the same positive number at every time.

This step uses neither mixing nor zero entropy of the extension YY, and does not make ηu\eta _u an invariant system. Section 6 of R will use only the fact that each fibre's XX marginal is the original μX\mu _X, together with the label-function relations above.